PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.74%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-20.74%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.74%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.35%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.35%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.40%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
127.62%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of ITRG's 98.67%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
92.55%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to ITRG's 98.67%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
91.37%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-64.44%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
68.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
62.99%
Positive short-term CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-48.46%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-58.90%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-6.03%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.13%
AR growth well above ITRG's 59.25%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.59%
Asset growth well under 50% of ITRG's 862.99%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.90%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.73%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 1.41%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.