PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-184.58%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 19.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-184.58%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 204.78%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1977.81%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 70.55%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2062.16%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 76.19%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1927.03%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 76.32%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.97%
Share reduction while ITRG is at 24.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.97%
Reduced diluted shares while ITRG is at 23.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
271.60%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-86.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.73%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-67.13%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
131.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 63.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
29.25%
Below 50% of ITRG's 94.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-5397.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 94.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-533.60%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 22.84%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-95.66%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-83.16%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-80.94%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.98%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.16%
Inventory growth of 100.16% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-48.88%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 88.79%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-65.09%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 84.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.69%
We expand SG&A while ITRG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.