PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.79%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-8.79%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3.78%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-771.41%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 32.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
4.55%
FCF growth under 50% of ITRG's 32.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.35%
Positive OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
75.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of ITRG's 92.22%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
28.76%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
71.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
39.29%
Below 50% of ITRG's 99.29%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-83.91%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-85.82%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-77.79%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 48.92%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.98%
AR growth of 40.98% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
323.22%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ITRG's 806247824950.00%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.94%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.57%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
We expand SG&A while ITRG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.