PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.05%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-9.80%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 16.74%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-11.55%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 32.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 30.70%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 30.70%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.72%
Share change of 1.72% while ITRG is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.09%
Diluted share count expanding well above ITRG's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-171.20%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 121.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-172.63%
Negative FCF growth while ITRG is at 121.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.88%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of ITRG's 101.18%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
76.94%
Below 50% of ITRG's 225.12%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
58.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of ITRG's 100.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
41.10%
Below 50% of ITRG's 94.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
31.99%
Below 50% of ITRG's 85.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
48.61%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of ITRG's 82.65%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
-94.89%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-89.45%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-87.15%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.03%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 9.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.81%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.88%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ITRG's 99.74%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.