10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.81%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.49%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 67.20%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-37.81%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
22.08%
Positive EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.08%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
75.89%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 5.51%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
75.89%
Diluted share count expanding well above ITRG's 29.37%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.24%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 117.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-67.89%
Negative FCF growth while ITRG is at 117.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.22%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of ITRG's 100.05%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-131.43%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 100.13%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-64.82%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 103.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-33.36%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 97.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
11.66%
Below 50% of ITRG's 99.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
18.90%
Below 50% of ITRG's 99.23%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-64.05%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-52.72%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-30.24%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 37.19%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
771.84%
Asset growth above 1.5x ITRG's 6.48%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
492.83%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ITRG's 5.62%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.49%
We expand SG&A while ITRG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.