PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-791.83%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-378.80%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 9.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-794.40%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-800.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-800.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
81.05%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 22.49%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
81.05%
Slight or no buyback while ITRG is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-995.74%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1198.37%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.96%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-23.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 99.85%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-675.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 99.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
86.49%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of ITRG's 99.79%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-133.67%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 98.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
80.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of ITRG's 95.86%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
-10.29%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
360.37%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1969.19%
Positive short-term equity growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
We show growth while ITRG is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1743.91%
Asset growth above 1.5x ITRG's 11.24%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
929.49%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ITRG's 19.37%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
378.32%
We expand SG&A while ITRG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.