PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-309.28%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-32.57%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-28.84%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.57%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-24.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.17%
Share change of 0.17% while ITRG is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.17%
Diluted share change of 0.17% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.25%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-62.94%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.74%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 93.47%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1251.41%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-12854.72%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-51.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 50.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-385.52%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 87.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-794.31%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
88.07%
Equity/share CAGR of 88.07% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
357.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 134.40%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
2821.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 130.94%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.41%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.06%
Positive BV/share change while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
90.44%
Debt growth far above ITRG's 3.91%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.12%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.