10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.37%
Positive gross profit growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
45.76%
Positive EBIT growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
45.45%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
46.59%
Positive net income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
45.11%
Positive EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
45.11%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.20%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
56.14%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-199.08%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is at 64.67%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-304.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1.97%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-260.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 77.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-191.43%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
31.59%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
828.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 148.50%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
2217.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 146.76%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.54%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
2.50%
Debt growth far above ITRG's 2.45%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
We cut SG&A while ITRG invests at 2.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.