PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.20%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
84.59%
Positive EBIT growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
69.43%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
78.32%
Positive net income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
81.99%
Positive EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
81.99%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
19.87%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 7.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
19.87%
Diluted share change of 19.87% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.81%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-55.75%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.83%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-64.39%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
65.10%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
80.68%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 43.31% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-1696.35%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 45.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
52.62%
Positive short-term CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
164.25%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1464.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 134.55%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-8.68%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 415.40%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.58%
Our AR growth while ITRG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.08%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
23.14%
Positive BV/share change while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.21%
We’re deleveraging while ITRG stands at 84.25%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.50%
We cut SG&A while ITRG invests at 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.