PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.98%
Positive gross profit growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-315.21%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-97.02%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-246.36%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-242.86%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-242.86%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.38%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 2.62%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above ITRG's 2.62%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-848.72%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-29.48%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.17%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-9768.63%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-160.70%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-67.17%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-731.94%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-133.30%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
165.49%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1703.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 153.11%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-10.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 493.66%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
140.85%
Our AR growth while ITRG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.36%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 21.09%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.16%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 45.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.09%
We’re deleveraging while ITRG stands at 9.15%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ITRG's 11.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.