PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5586.54%
Positive gross profit growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
46.96%
EBIT growth above 1.5x ITRG's 19.46%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
52.67%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ITRG's 23.12%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
47.48%
Net income growth above 1.5x ITRG's 18.30%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
-300.00%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 23.81%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-312.37%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 26.19%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
3.68%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 5.73%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.67%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 10.41%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-487.38%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-0.13%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-218.49%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 88.13%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-157.57%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
24.72%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-58.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 84.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
32.07%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
78.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
91.72%
Positive growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-58.36%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ITRG is at 158.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
2.21%
Positive short-term equity growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10850.00%
Our AR growth while ITRG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.78%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.18%
We have some new debt while ITRG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.99%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 4.66%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.