PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.76%
Revenue growth of 15.76% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
23.93%
Positive gross profit growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.05%
Positive EBIT growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
105.71%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
110.12%
Positive net income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
95.24%
Positive EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
105.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
14.91%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 7.94%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.53%
Diluted share count expanding well above ITRG's 8.82%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.14%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
9.89%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3757.52%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 91.82%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
3723.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 59.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
607.62%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 61.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1680.79%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 90.04% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
431.09%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 62.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
297.41%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 39.39%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
581.22%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 148.06%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
14.40%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
81.95%
Positive short-term equity growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.40%
AR growth well above ITRG's 7.29%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
22.95%
Inventory growth of 22.95% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
3.76%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-7.68%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-13.89%
We’re deleveraging while ITRG stands at 2.73%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.23%
We expand SG&A while ITRG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.