PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.91%
Negative revenue growth while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.73%
Negative gross profit growth while ITRG is at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-23.90%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 3.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.51%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-29.19%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 13.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.96%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 13.64%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 13.64%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.93%
Share count expansion well above ITRG's 0.86%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above ITRG's 0.04%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-115.46%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-132.78%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.94%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG stands at 69.03%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
34.72%
Positive OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
61.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
367.45%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 52.95% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
232.82%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
173.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
372.05%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 127.79%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
32.63%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
115.79%
Positive short-term equity growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.65%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
10.83%
Inventory growth of 10.83% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.56%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 35.71%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.43%
Positive BV/share change while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.31%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 30.52%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.