PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.92%
Revenue growth of 15.92% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
16.66%
Positive gross profit growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.32%
Positive EBIT growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
70.99%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-3.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 31.58%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.08%
Share reduction while ITRG is at 73.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.15%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 73.66%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
573.30%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
341.16%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
424.22%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 53.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
2558.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
748.61%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 77.68% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
246.44%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 61.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
506.34%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 34.21%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
461.51%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 148.55%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
22.94%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
96.23%
Positive short-term equity growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1524.69%
AR growth well above ITRG's 175.59%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
8.52%
We show growth while ITRG is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.47%
Asset growth well under 50% of ITRG's 17.37%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
11.98%
Under 50% of ITRG's 113.08%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.61%
We’re deleveraging while ITRG stands at 7.65%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.