PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.72%
Revenue growth of 1.72% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-6.23%
Negative gross profit growth while ITRG is at 10.57%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.86%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-58.14%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-57.75%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-59.49%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.14%
Share reduction while ITRG is at 24.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 24.13%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.40%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
0.53%
FCF growth under 50% of ITRG's 34.77%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3068.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 1.77%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
319.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 79.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
388.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 59.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
329.83%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 97.06% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
147.34%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 77.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
150.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 59.72%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
487.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 116.56%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
28.48%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
108.08%
Positive short-term equity growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.84%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
5.83%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ITRG's 12.84%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.68%
Positive asset growth while ITRG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.76%
Positive BV/share change while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.36%
We have some new debt while ITRG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.