PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth of 4.40% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
3.99%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x ITRG's 2.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-335.97%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 14.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-37.40%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 20.90%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1188.31%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 13.34%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-1224.26%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1287.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while ITRG is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-5.12%
Reduced diluted shares while ITRG is at 0.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.45%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 25.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.23%
Negative FCF growth while ITRG is at 15.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1396.49%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 92.41%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
175.98%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 50.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
756.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 77.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-18.94%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 88.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.03%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 39.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-456.88%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 75.71%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1373.63%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 197.96%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
74.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
81.70%
Positive short-term equity growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.55%
We show growth while ITRG is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-17.28%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-12.49%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-34.48%
We’re deleveraging while ITRG stands at 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 17.89%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.