PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.43%
Revenue growth of 17.43% while ITRG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
19.06%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x ITRG's 0.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-0.76%
Negative EBIT growth while ITRG is at 0.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
51.47%
Positive operating income growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-12.86%
Negative net income growth while ITRG stands at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.50%
Negative EPS growth while ITRG is at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.31%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ITRG is at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.72%
Share change of 0.72% while ITRG is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.48%
Diluted share change of 0.48% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
Positive OCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
9.04%
Positive FCF growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8402402.28%
5Y CAGR of 8402402.28% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1862.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 85.80%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
665.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 77.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1450.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 81.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2319.35%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 93.81% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
325.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 76.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
265.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 81.71%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1766.33%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 110.42%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
133.97%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
89.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.87%
Our AR growth while ITRG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.60%
Inventory growth of 0.60% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
4.15%
Asset growth well under 50% of ITRG's 13.78%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.71%
Positive BV/share change while ITRG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-24.69%
We’re deleveraging while ITRG stands at 3.25%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ITRG's 48.64%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.