PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.59%
Negative revenue growth while ITRG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.58%
Negative gross profit growth while ITRG is at 2789.83%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.48%
EBIT growth below 50% of ITRG's 276.06%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-35.23%
Negative operating income growth while ITRG is at 130.94%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
23.38%
Net income growth under 50% of ITRG's 240.97%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
24.09%
EPS growth under 50% of ITRG's 243.98%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.58%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ITRG's 243.98%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.43%
Share change of 0.43% while ITRG is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-3.86%
Reduced diluted shares while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.99%
Negative OCF growth while ITRG is at 246.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.64%
Negative FCF growth while ITRG is at 257.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1645.54%
3Y CAGR of 1645.54% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
2483.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 179.28%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
820.83%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 125.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
301.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 125.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
7066.69%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 114.34% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
378.04%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 129.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
500.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 133.36%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
2935.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 132.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
134.69%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ITRG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
111.82%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ITRG's 20.88%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. ITRG's 139.58%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.33%
Inventory growth of 1.33% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-3.29%
Negative asset growth while ITRG invests at 162.13%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
5.10%
Under 50% of ITRG's 275.78%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-96.43%
We’re deleveraging while ITRG stands at 105.87%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.63%
We expand SG&A while ITRG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.