PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.64%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of ITRG's 87.89%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
20.77%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ITRG's 155.22%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-180.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
72.34%
Operating income growth under 50% of ITRG's 444.78%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-367.69%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-368.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-381.69%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 90.72%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ITRG's 112.85%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
818.43%
OCF growth of 818.43% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-1121.77%
Negative FCF growth while ITRG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.30%
3Y CAGR of 195.30% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
14434.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 14434.01% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
3412.29%
OCF/share CAGR of 3412.29% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
1571.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 1571.00% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-47476.14%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is at 101.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-297.95%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ITRG is 105.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-409.43%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ITRG is 102.51%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1023.12%
Equity/share CAGR of 1023.12% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
137.82%
Equity/share CAGR of 137.82% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
80.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 80.89% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.13%
AR growth of 79.13% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
120.96%
Inventory growth of 120.96% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
203.25%
Asset growth of 203.25% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-12.48%
We have a declining book value while ITRG shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
19103.99%
Debt growth of 19103.99% while ITRG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
SG&A growth well above ITRG's 136.79%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.