10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.58%
Positive EBIT growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
53.99%
Operating income growth similar to ODV's 56.72%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
2.39%
Positive net income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-244.02%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-218.85%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.18%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-78.18%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-78.18%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV stands at 75.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
78.75%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
78.75%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
78.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-26.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ODV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-26.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ODV is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-26.29%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.10%
Our AR growth while ODV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.75%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.16%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.99%
We cut SG&A while ODV invests at 15.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.