10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.05%
Positive EBIT growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
12.50%
Positive EPS growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
12.50%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
14.90%
Share count expansion well above ODV's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
14.90%
Diluted share count expanding well above ODV's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.44%
Positive OCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
84.59%
Positive FCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.16%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-54.16%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
13.48%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ODV's 75.19%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
14.04%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
14.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-304.47%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-49.97%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while ODV stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-49.97%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ODV is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-32.13%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.31%
Our AR growth while ODV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.98%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.03%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.05%
We cut SG&A while ODV invests at 15.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.