PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-309.28%
Negative gross profit growth while ODV is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-32.57%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-28.84%
Negative operating income growth while ODV is at 56.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-32.57%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-24.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.17%
Share count expansion well above ODV's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.17%
Diluted share count expanding well above ODV's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.25%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-62.94%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.74%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-1251.41%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-12854.72%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV stands at 75.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-51.75%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-385.52%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-794.31%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
88.07%
Equity/share CAGR of 88.07% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
357.57%
Equity/share CAGR of 357.57% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
2821.64%
Positive short-term equity growth while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
We show growth while ODV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.41%
Positive asset growth while ODV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.06%
Positive BV/share change while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
90.44%
We have some new debt while ODV reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.12%
We cut SG&A while ODV invests at 15.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.