10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.06%
Negative gross profit growth while ODV is at 68.15%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
91.49%
Positive EBIT growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
91.68%
Positive net income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
92.40%
Positive EPS growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
91.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.98%
Share count expansion well above ODV's 3.37%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.58%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ODV's 3.37%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.15%
OCF growth above 1.5x ODV's 33.80%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
45.00%
Positive FCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.34%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
96.36%
Positive OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
99.25%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
63.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
50.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
86.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
114.01%
Equity/share CAGR of 114.01% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
2306.49%
Equity/share CAGR of 2306.49% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-38.56%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while ODV is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.67%
AR growth well above ODV's 6.68%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.06%
Positive asset growth while ODV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.08%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
46.92%
Debt shrinking faster vs. ODV's 291.23%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.94%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.