PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5586.54%
Positive gross profit growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
46.96%
Positive EBIT growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
52.67%
Positive operating income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
47.48%
Positive net income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-300.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-312.37%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
3.68%
Slight or no buybacks while ODV is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.67%
Slight or no buyback while ODV is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-487.38%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-0.13%
Negative FCF growth while ODV is at 228.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-218.49%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-157.57%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
24.72%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-58.73%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
32.07%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
78.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
91.72%
Below 50% of ODV's 260.47%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-58.36%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while ODV is at 260.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
2.21%
Below 50% of ODV's 260.47%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10850.00%
Our AR growth while ODV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.78%
We have a declining book value while ODV shows 168.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.18%
Debt shrinking faster vs. ODV's 16.60%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.99%
We expand SG&A while ODV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.