PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Positive revenue growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ODV's 63.99%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-335.97%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1188.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1224.26%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1287.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.22%
Share count expansion well above ODV's 0.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-5.12%
Reduced diluted shares while ODV is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.45%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-19.23%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1396.49%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 49.14%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
175.98%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 49.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
756.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-18.94%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ODV is at 12.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.03%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ODV is 12.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-456.88%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1373.63%
Positive growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
74.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
81.70%
Positive short-term equity growth while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.55%
We show growth while ODV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-17.28%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-12.49%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-34.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
SG&A growth well above ODV's 8.20%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.