PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.43%
Positive revenue growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
19.06%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ODV's 186.11%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.76%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
51.47%
Positive operating income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-12.86%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.31%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.72%
Share count expansion well above ODV's 1.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.48%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x ODV's 1.10%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
Similar OCF growth to ODV's 7.44%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
9.04%
FCF growth 50-75% of ODV's 13.02%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8402402.28%
5Y CAGR of 8402402.28% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1862.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 1862.77% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
665.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 665.23% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
1450.91%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2319.35%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 52.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
325.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 52.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
265.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 44.65%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1766.33%
Equity/share CAGR of 1766.33% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
133.97%
Equity/share CAGR of 133.97% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
89.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.87%
Our AR growth while ODV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.60%
We show growth while ODV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.15%
Asset growth above 1.5x ODV's 1.76%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.71%
Positive BV/share change while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-24.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.36%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ODV's 24.45%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.