PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.59%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.58%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.48%
EBIT growth below 50% of ODV's 58.46%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-35.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
23.38%
Net income growth under 50% of ODV's 53.31%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
24.09%
EPS growth under 50% of ODV's 57.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.58%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ODV's 57.50%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.43%
Share reduction more than 1.5x ODV's 10.83%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-3.86%
Reduced diluted shares while ODV is at 9.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-11.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1645.54%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2483.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 20.23%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
820.83%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 20.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
301.84%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 87.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
7066.69%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 91.00% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
378.04%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 91.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
500.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 95.48%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
2935.48%
Positive growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
134.69%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
111.82%
Positive short-term equity growth while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.55%
AR growth well above ODV's 3.05%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.33%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ODV's 58.23%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-3.29%
Negative asset growth while ODV invests at 11.72%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
5.10%
Positive BV/share change while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-96.43%
We’re deleveraging while ODV stands at 539.42%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.63%
We expand SG&A while ODV cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.