PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
90.58%
Revenue growth of 90.58% while ODV is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
81.32%
Gross profit growth of 81.32% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
356.99%
Positive EBIT growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.24%
Operating income growth similar to ODV's 56.72%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
169.04%
Positive net income growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
168.18%
Positive EPS growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
159.09%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.78%
Share count expansion well above ODV's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
20.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above ODV's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.96%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
117.12%
Positive FCF growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
337.29%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
16338.30%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
9977.99%
Positive OCF/share growth while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
270.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ODV's 75.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
27178.37%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1607.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
6396.02%
Positive short-term CAGR while ODV is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3252.61%
Equity/share CAGR of 3252.61% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
114.35%
Equity/share CAGR of 114.35% while ODV is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
78.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.30%
Our AR growth while ODV is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
8.75%
We show growth while ODV is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.58%
Positive asset growth while ODV is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.99%
Positive BV/share change while ODV is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-5.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.41%
We cut SG&A while ODV invests at 15.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.