10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.84%
EBIT growth above 1.5x OR's 15.15%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
31.84%
Operating income growth above 1.5x OR's 7.56%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
32.55%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x OR's 26.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
32.46%
EPS growth above 1.5x OR's 21.43%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
32.46%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OR's 21.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.10%
OCF growth above 1.5x OR's 11.49%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
71.40%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.60%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while OR stands at 273.05%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-81.60%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is at 192.29%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-81.60%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR stands at 22738.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
75.43%
Below 50% of OR's 301.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
75.43%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of OR's 117.59%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
75.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of OR's 86.14%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
-78.19%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-78.19%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-78.19%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.71%
Firm’s AR is declining while OR shows 8.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.10%
Negative asset growth while OR invests at 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-8.83%
We have a declining book value while OR shows 5.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.93%
We cut SG&A while OR invests at 19.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.