PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.77%
Positive EBIT growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
54.67%
Positive operating income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
58.77%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
59.21%
Positive EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
59.21%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.13%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
6.15%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.21%
OCF/share CAGR of 58.21% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
88.21%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 88.21% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
29.53%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 29.53% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
41.88%
Net income/share CAGR of 41.88% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
87.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 87.90% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-44.76%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-61.64%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while OR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-7.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while OR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Negative asset growth while OR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.86%
We have a declining book value while OR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.