10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-230.76%
Negative EBIT growth while OR is at 58.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-300.75%
Negative operating income growth while OR is at 58.54%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-637.65%
Negative net income growth while OR stands at 147.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-700.00%
Negative EPS growth while OR is at 150.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-700.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OR is at 150.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
84.41%
Similar OCF growth to OR's 82.15%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
78.99%
FCF growth similar to OR's 83.46%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.43%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
99.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
97.47%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
10.73%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
79.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
55.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-91.93%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-85.28%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while OR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-87.64%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while OR is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while OR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-8.41%
Negative asset growth while OR invests at 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-15.17%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.75%
We expand SG&A while OR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.