PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.58%
Positive revenue growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.29%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
55.73%
EBIT growth below 50% of OR's 6436.42%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-39.93%
Negative operating income growth while OR is at 6436.42%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1589.95%
Net income growth above 1.5x OR's 63.26%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
1412.50%
EPS growth above 1.5x OR's 61.99%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1350.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OR's 62.34%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
11.52%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
17.15%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.60%
OCF growth under 50% of OR's 17080.80%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
13.76%
FCF growth under 50% of OR's 170.59%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4703886.36%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
837.52%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
869.30%
Below 50% of OR's 2544.82%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
380.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 4.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
450.21%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
318.45%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OR's 216.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
207.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OR's 147.36%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
322.21%
Equity/share CAGR of 322.21% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
69.00%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
106.51%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.52%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
18.51%
We show growth while OR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
41.95%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
54.35%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.60%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.