PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.72%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of OR's 2.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-6.23%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.86%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-58.14%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-57.75%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-59.49%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.14%
Share reduction while OR is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.64%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.40%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
0.53%
FCF growth under 50% of OR's 110.10%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3068.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
319.68%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 77.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
388.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 7.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
329.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
147.34%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
150.89%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
487.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 487.89% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
28.48%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
108.08%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.84%
Firm’s AR is declining while OR shows 35.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
5.83%
Inventory growth of 5.83% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.68%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.76%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
20.36%
We have some new debt while OR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.42%
We cut SG&A while OR invests at 60.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.