PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of OR's 4.99%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
3.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OR's 17.02%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-335.97%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1188.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1224.26%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1287.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.22%
Share count expansion well above OR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-5.12%
Reduced diluted shares while OR is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.45%
Negative OCF growth while OR is at 16.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.23%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1396.49%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
175.98%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OR's 128.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
756.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 35.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-18.94%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-95.03%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OR is 50.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-456.88%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1373.63%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
74.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
81.70%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.55%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. OR's 1299900.00%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-17.28%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-12.49%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-34.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.80%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OR's 297.91%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.