PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.64%
Positive revenue growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
20.77%
Positive gross profit growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-180.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
72.34%
Positive operating income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-367.69%
Negative net income growth while OR stands at 129.94%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-368.62%
Negative EPS growth while OR is at 134.51%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-381.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OR is at 134.51%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.22%
Share count expansion well above OR's 0.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.22%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 0.90%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
818.43%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-1121.77%
Negative FCF growth while OR is at 395.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
195.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
14434.01%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 1042.85%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
3412.29%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 53.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1571.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 74.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-47476.14%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-297.95%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OR is 252.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-409.43%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR is 514.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1023.12%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
137.82%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
80.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.13%
Our AR growth while OR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
120.96%
We show growth while OR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
203.25%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-12.48%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
19103.99%
We have some new debt while OR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
173.81%
SG&A growth well above OR's 20.83%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.