PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.60M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
90.58%
Revenue growth of 90.58% while THM is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
81.32%
Positive gross profit growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
356.99%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.24%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
169.04%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
168.18%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
159.09%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.78%
Share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 2.62%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
20.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 2.62%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.96%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
117.12%
FCF growth 50-75% of THM's 200.00%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
337.29%
Positive 3Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
16338.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 118.77%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
9977.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 149.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
270.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 156.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
27178.37%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 47.43% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1607.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
6396.02%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3252.61%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
114.35%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
78.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.30%
AR growth of 101.30% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
8.75%
Inventory growth of 8.75% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.58%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.99%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-5.06%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.41%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 106.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.