PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.84%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.84%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
32.55%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
32.46%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
32.46%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.10%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
71.40%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.60%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-81.60%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-81.60%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
75.43%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
75.43%
Positive 5Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
75.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-78.19%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 1023.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-78.19%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 1009.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-78.19%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 105.59%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.71%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.10%
Negative asset growth while THM invests at 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-8.83%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.93%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 333.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.