10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.14%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 17.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-44.16%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 23.04%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-34.05%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
8.66%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.66%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
38.81%
Share count expansion well above THM's 3.25%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
38.81%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 3.25%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-314.73%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 56.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-321.61%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 54.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-469.67%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-469.67%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-469.67%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-301.52%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-301.52%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-301.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 53.51%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-43.55%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 967.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-43.55%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 1250.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-43.55%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 108.38%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
88.11%
AR growth well above THM's 3.03%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.71%
Asset growth above 1.5x THM's 3.35%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-13.33%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.25%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.