PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.95%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 36.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-21.95%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 36.26%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-22.57%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 56.12%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-22.89%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 58.91%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-22.89%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 58.91%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.43%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
76.02%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.22%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-23.22%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-23.22%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
88.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
88.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
88.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-77.26%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 2507.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-77.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 2629.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.26%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 183.29%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.36%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-619524.61%
Inventory is declining while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
88.59%
Asset growth at 50-75% of THM's 120.71%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
72.07%
50-75% of THM's 113.80%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.15%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.