PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.24%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-75.08%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
27.82%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-61.17%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-61.17%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
8.45%
Share change of 8.45% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
8.45%
Diluted share change of 8.45% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.70%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
92.07%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
178.85%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
178.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
139.10%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-50.96%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-50.96%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
71.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-23.96%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 2061.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-23.96%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 91.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-39.36%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 150.77%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.38%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 80.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.07%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.50%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.09%
SG&A declining or stable vs. THM's 338.84%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.