PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.05%
EBIT growth of 65.05% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
12.50%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
12.50%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
14.90%
Share change of 14.90% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
14.90%
Diluted share change of 14.90% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.44%
OCF growth of 6.44% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
84.59%
FCF growth of 84.59% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.16%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-54.16%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
13.48%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
14.04%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
14.04%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 1.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-304.47%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-49.97%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 1918.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-49.97%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while THM is at 293.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-32.13%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 231.27%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.31%
AR growth of 24.31% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.98%
Negative asset growth while THM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-14.03%
We have a declining book value while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.05%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.