PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.98%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
146.55%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
50.17%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
54.55%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
54.55%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
27.33%
Share count expansion well above THM's 18.60%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
27.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 18.60%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.13%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-65.46%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
144.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 3.71%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
124.70%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 64.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
124.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 124.88% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
99.47%
Positive 10Y CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
97.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 51.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
90.88%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 90.88% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-97.39%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while THM stands at 393.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-88.05%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-86.62%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while THM is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.31%
Negative asset growth while THM invests at 8.81%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-35.38%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
236.01%
SG&A growth well above THM's 26.99%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.