PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.92%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x THM's 0.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-172.21%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-167.00%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 1.43%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-171.86%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 3.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-160.00%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 2.91%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-160.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 2.91%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
4.77%
Share change of 4.77% while THM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
4.77%
Diluted share change of 4.77% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.75%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
3.49%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.39%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 44.27%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-35.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 48.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-137.41%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 85.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-28.30%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 93.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-233.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 31.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
73.11%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
151.95%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
976.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.86%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-24.70%
Inventory is declining while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.62%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.31%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
167.32%
SG&A growth well above THM's 12.17%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.