PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.70%
Positive gross profit growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
30.65%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
25.81%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
30.59%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.77%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.04%
Share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 0.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 0.11%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.33%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 23.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
5.84%
FCF growth under 50% of THM's 23.82%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 9.78%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
4.13%
Below 50% of THM's 72.37%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-226.52%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 5.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-218.34%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 18.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-60.31%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 96.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-384.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 9.96%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
63.19%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
149.83%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
874.71%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.14%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-29.13%
Inventory is declining while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.13%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.02%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.