PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.42%
Negative gross profit growth while THM is at 597.32%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-18.70%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 13.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.01%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 13.52%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-18.77%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 20.89%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.83%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 21.30%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.75%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 23.15%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.56%
Share reduction while THM is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.56%
Reduced diluted shares while THM is at 2.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.87%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x THM's 51.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
-116.54%
Negative FCF growth while THM is at 51.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.47%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x THM's 40.75%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-206.47%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 98.97%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-150.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 58.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
92.12%
Similar net income/share CAGR to THM's 88.17%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-377.45%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 97.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1393.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 40.22%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-46.37%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
495.46%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1957.08%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.92%
AR growth of 2.92% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
10.99%
Inventory growth of 10.99% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
34.49%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
36.38%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.61%
SG&A declining or stable vs. THM's 60.59%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.