PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.05%
Gross profit growth of 3.05% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
4.71%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.30%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.32%
Net income growth under 50% of THM's 10.31%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-1.00%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 20.31%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 20.31%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
5.48%
Share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 11.66%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
5.48%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x THM's 11.66%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.72%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 19.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
24.28%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x THM's 19.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.95%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 53.95%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-297.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 89.09%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-1146.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 72.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-157.42%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 40.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-342.92%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 21.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-4884.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 70.95%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
75.22%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
356.74%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
2396.47%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.97%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.67%
Inventory growth of 6.67% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-3.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.15%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-5.26%
We’re deleveraging while THM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.70%
We expand SG&A while THM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.