PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-309.28%
Negative gross profit growth while THM is at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-32.57%
Negative EBIT growth while THM is at 17.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-28.84%
Negative operating income growth while THM is at 16.40%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-32.57%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-24.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-24.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.17%
Share count expansion well above THM's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.17%
Diluted share count expanding well above THM's 0.06%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.25%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-62.94%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.74%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 49.47%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1251.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 82.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-12854.72%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 25.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-51.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 64.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-385.52%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 83.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-794.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 21.54%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
88.07%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
357.57%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
2821.64%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.41%
Positive asset growth while THM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.06%
Positive BV/share change while THM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
90.44%
Debt growth of 90.44% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.12%
We cut SG&A while THM invests at 18.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.