10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2315.49%
Negative gross profit growth while THM is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-169.17%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-164.37%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-162.97%
Negative net income growth while THM stands at 28.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-89.84%
Negative EPS growth while THM is at 29.41%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-89.44%
Negative diluted EPS growth while THM is at 29.41%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.22%
Share reduction while THM is at 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.22%
Reduced diluted shares while THM is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-151.98%
Negative OCF growth while THM is at 69.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
57.96%
FCF growth 75-90% of THM's 69.31%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-747.36%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 95.33%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-2069.53%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 90.86%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-4739.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 80.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-3252.86%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 90.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
39.01%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of THM's 53.75%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-1259.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 49.92%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
41.94%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
743.11%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1977.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-17.07%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
17.91%
Debt growth of 17.91% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.02%
SG&A growth well above THM's 78.50%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.