PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.20%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x THM's 23.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
57.98%
EBIT growth similar to THM's 60.32%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
57.14%
Operating income growth similar to THM's 55.82%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
55.69%
Net income growth above 1.5x THM's 8.97%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
56.03%
EPS growth above 1.5x THM's 8.33%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
55.94%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x THM's 8.33%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.39%
Share count expansion well above THM's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.18%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-177.05%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 71.23%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-5849.80%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 75.43%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-746.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 64.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1416.20%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 92.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-600.04%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 87.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-447.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 79.48%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
40.96%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
809.76%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1934.19%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while THM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.94%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.62%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
50.78%
Debt growth of 50.78% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.