PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Orla Mining Ltd. (ORLA)
11.070.67 (6.44%)
10.50 - 11.12
3.81 - 12.83
1.80M / 1.61M (Avg.)
158.14 | 0.07
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.37%
Gross profit growth of 20.37% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
45.76%
Positive EBIT growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
45.45%
Positive operating income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
46.59%
Positive net income growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
45.11%
Positive EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
45.11%
Positive diluted EPS growth while THM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.20%
Positive OCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
56.14%
Positive FCF growth while THM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of THM's 65.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-199.08%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while THM is at 70.91%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-304.59%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while THM stands at 61.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1.97%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while THM is at 88.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-260.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while THM is 49.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-191.43%
Negative 3Y CAGR while THM is 58.35%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
31.59%
Positive growth while THM is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
828.10%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while THM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
2217.64%
Positive short-term equity growth while THM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.54%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
2.50%
Debt growth of 2.50% while THM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.99%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.